Indian Movies Distort Historical Fact Portraying Muslim Rulers In Negative, Cruel & Furious Look Whereas Opponent Hindu Rajas Shown Beautifully Dressed, Pleasant Look and Dominated Over Muslim Rulers With Their Roaring Dialogues.

Indian Movies Distort Historical Fact Portraying Muslim Rulers In Negative, Cruel & Furious Look Whereas Opponent Hindu Rajas Shown Beautifully Dressed, Pleasant Look and Dominated Over Muslim Rulers With Their Roaring Dialogues.

In Indian movies since a long time Muslim rulers have been portrayed in negative and furious look whereas the opponent belongs to Hindu community shown beautifully dressed, pleasant look and dominated over muslim rulers with their roaring dialogues or with their presentations. Completely injustice and distorted the historical facts. Such practice trying to damage and to malign muslim image and we are still watching these movies without raising any question. The muslims of India must raise their voice against this injustice as every historians knows what muslim ruler have done for India. The symbol of Love from Taj Mahal to Constructed G.T Road and Laal Qila is a proof of muslim administration, love and Peace.  

Few months ago a picture claimed as Tipu Sultan’s was doing rounds on internet. Actually it wasn’t Tipu Sultan’s picture as camera was not invented during his lifetime, the picture was not shared by Muslims but by right wingers. Surprising, isn’t it? The reason the picture was widely shared by them is that the person in the pic is dark and has unpleasant look. Ramus wanted to say that the Muslim warrior was so ugly. Depiction of Alauddin Khilji can also be questioned. Alauddin Khilji is not only depicted as a barbaric, self obsessed person in the movie Padmavati but he is also made to look ugly in the movie with dark shiny face, scars on his face, uncombed long hairs. In both cases these two Muslim rulers are depicted as dark skinned, proves how racist right wingers are though majority of Ramus are themselves dark skinned. 

You may be as dark as a coal but it doesn’t reflect what kind of person you are, it’s your character which defines you. Depiction of Alauddin Khilji in Padmavati movie is completely different than what he looks in his portraits. The intention of Ramus is clear, they want to demonize their “opponents” so much that they not just distorts the history of their “enemies” but they even distorts the looks. And this is not just limited to modern world, they have been doing this since the time their Vedas were composed. Yes, you read that right. Zoroastrian god is called Ahura while the word is distorted in Vedas as Asura and Asuras (Parsis) are depicted as monsters in the Vedas. While we know that Parsis don’t look anything like monsters. Those who lived in Arab were called Malecchas and the white people (Gori chamdi wale angrez) are described as Yavanas in Hindu texts. Swami Dayanand Saraswati the founder of Arya Samaj wrote, 

“The countries other than Aryavarta are called Dasyus and Malechha countries. MANU 10:45, 2:23. The people living in the north-east, north, north-west were called Raakshasas. You can still see that the description of Raakshasas given therein tallies with the ugly appearance of the negroes of today.” Satyarth Prakash, by Dayanand Saraswati, Ch 8, page 266, Tr. Chrinajiva Bhardwaja

You see he compares Rakshasas (Demons) with Negroes i.e. with black people of today. These guys are distorting the looks of rulers of medieval period, you think they would correctly describe how their opponents looked in the Vedic period? Rakshasas, Dasyus etc. were no monsters, they were normal human beings. Some Rakshasas are really described as having monstrous looks but that cannot be applicable to all “people living in the north-east, north, north-west”. And Ramus don't apply this logic while describing their Bhagwans. Shiva in Hindu scriptures is described as having eyes like monkeys, sometime laughing and sometime crying.